|
|
Stephane DesmulieFirst message : 2008-03-20 17:34:09 http://stephartwork.blogspot.comOperating system : OS 10.5 RAM : 4Go Computer model : MacBook Pro Processor : DualCore Graphic cardType : Integre Card name : Nvidia Video memory : >256 Mo Quiktime : 7.5 Network card : ethernet
Stephane Desmulie


 |
BIG differences in rendering speed?
I think it's a little bit exagerated don't you think?
If you compare default settings like the high level of radiosity, for your image we obtain approximatively 8min and in high DEFAULT level in v3 we obtain 11min...
3 min for a BIG difference of quality I personnaly think that this is not a realy enormous problem.
Of course if you use expert settings and you push higher, the difference in rendering time will be more important.
So I'm very interested by your opinion, do you really think that the quality doesn't justify a little increase of rendering time?
Of course we continue to work on performances, so we try always to optimize Artlantis don't worry about that.
Best regards,
Stephane Desmulie / ABVENT.
| Reply
|
|
|
Stamatis
First message : 2009-09-15 17:31:18 Operating system : Windows Vista RAM : 4Go Computer model : revit 2010 Processor : QuadCore Graphic card Type : PCI-E Card name : ATI Video memory : >256 Mo Quiktime : sais pas Network card : ethernet
Stamatis

|
You miss understood me...(i hope)
i was talking "high default settings in ART3" compared to "high custom settings also in art3"
there is a difference in time BUT not so much in quality...
| Reply
|
|
|
Tayssir
First message : 2006-01-15 10:49:42
Tayssir

|
Hi Stephane,
Please re-read what I said
( I didn't have the chance yet to try it with LARGE project...I think there will be a BIG difference in time).
So I wasn't talking about the few minutes in this example, (however yes I find 3 Min out of 8 is BIG difference) and actually as I said that I expect that to get bigger ratio on large projects (not sure though..hope I am wrong).
And answering your question :
do you really think that the quality doesn't justify a little increase of rendering time?
Quality Does justify that in general ,but what amount of quality and what amount of rendering time? actually it is too early for me to say if it does or not with ATL3 . for example when Artlantis Studio and R were released, It was really clear that for that huge jump any one would be happy for extra time of rendering ( can't even remember if there was an extra time at all- because it is fast ! ).
But to be honest its not that easy to detect the advantages of the new rendering engine, please don't get me wrong .. I can tell in the above example that the Grass object near the camera looks really better. but the building ? really I can't see a difference (yes in small details, not in the main thing).
So far I love the options where I can control the color bleeding and bouncing and so, and I really think it is powerful.
Anyhow I still think it is a nice version, and I hope that I am wrong about my expectations on large projects !
Thank you abvent !
| Reply
|
|
|
Stephane DesmulieFirst message : 2008-03-20 17:34:09 http://stephartwork.blogspot.comOperating system : OS 10.5 RAM : 4Go Computer model : MacBook Pro Processor : DualCore Graphic cardType : Integre Card name : Nvidia Video memory : >256 Mo Quiktime : 7.5 Network card : ethernet
Stephane Desmulie


 |
Stam don't worry, I understood what you said. ;o)
Tayssir ok I think I was a little tired yesterday... ^^
Radiosity in v3 is more precise, and on detailled scenes you will see a big difference.
Continue to test it, and tell on the forum if you find problems or if you have wishes for the future of Artlantis, because we keep all that our users said in mind. ;o)
Best regards,
Stephane Desmulie / ABVENT.
| Reply
|
|
|
MossFirst message : 2009-01-19 10:01:43 http://www.dmpmedia.co.za
Moss


 |
In the tests I have done thus far, I have found a really big difference in rendering time (to qualify this, I am still learning all the different settings, so I hope to reduce my render times). I'm not criticising the new version, it has some fantastic improvements and the render quality and realism is really good, so I think Abvent have done well.
What's important though is that Artlantis markets itself as "the fastest stand-alone rendering application …… ideal for quickly and easily creating high resolution 3D renderings". If all of this still holds true, then that is great, but there has definitely been a sacrifice of time in favour of quality.
| Reply
|
|
|
arkidommel
First message : 2009-11-01 03:26:25 Operating system : Windows XP RAM : 1Go Computer model : Core 2 Quad Processor : Intel Graphic card Type : PCI-E Card name : Nvidia Video memory : >256 Mo Quiktime : 7.5 Network card : ethernet
arkidommel


 |
I LOVE ARTLANTIS. THEY KEPT ON IMPROVING. IS THE BEST EVER AND THE FASTEST...
| Reply
|
|