First message : 2009-06-19 15:39:43 Operating system : RAM : Computer model : Processor : Graphic card Type : Card name : Video memory : Quiktime : Network card :
Another comparative test, vray versus Artlantis.
Artlantis renders get acceptable quality, is much faster and the difference is slight.
Although I have not worked hard textures.
Regards.
First message : 2009-06-19 15:39:43 Operating system : RAM : Computer model : Processor : Graphic card Type : Card name : Video memory : Quiktime : Network card :
First message : 2010-04-27 05:31:20 Operating system : Windows XP RAM : 1Go Computer model : ENTEL Processor : Intel Graphic card Type : AGP Card name : Nvidia Video memory : sais pas Quiktime : 7.0 Network card : wifi
this is a good test!
i think artlantis is very good to work, and you can get very good results fast!
For me one of the bad things of artlantis is that everything looks very plastic comparing to v-ray.
This is a little model and i think you cant compare the total potencial of v-ray render engine with this images, but it's a good idea that you have making this post.
I dont think that the principal goal of abvent was get the quality of others render engines. They are making a good work with artlantis, the program is fast, simple and with very good results! One problem of the previous version was the white and the shadows, with the version 3 that problem was solved
